Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Orthopedics ; 44(4): e534-e538, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1320603

ABSTRACT

In 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic limited musculoskeletal care to urgent or "nonelective" office visits and procedures. No guidelines exist to inform patients or physicians what meets these criteria. The purpose of this multi-institutional study was to describe the differences in perceptions of urgency for musculoskeletal complaints between patients and providers during the COVID-19 pandemic. An anonymous survey was distributed to patients who visited the authors' orthopedic clinics in January and February 2020 and practicing orthopedic surgeons. The surveys were administered in May 2020 after COVID-19 was officially labeled a pandemic and included questions regarding demographic information and perceptions of orthopedic urgency. A total of 1491 patients and 128 physicians completed the surveys. A significantly higher percentage of physicians considered the following diagnoses an appropriate indication for an urgent visit compared with patients: fracture (P<.001), acute dislocation (P<.001), infection (P<.001), neurologic compromise (P<.001), tumor (P<.001), acute tendon injury (P<.001), weakness (P<.001), inability to bear weight (P<.001), post-surgical problem (P<.001), and painful joint effusion (P<.001). There were no significant differences in the perception of urgency for the following conditions: bursitis/tendonitis (P=1.00), joint/extremity deformity without pain (P=.113), and loss of range of motion of a joint (P=.467). Younger patients and those with higher levels of education were significantly more likely to consider their conditions urgent. Patients may require additional education to prevent delay in treatment of urgent conditions-especially time-sensitive conditions such as neurologic compromise, tumors, and infections-when access to physicians is limited. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(4):e534-e538.].


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Musculoskeletal Diseases , Physicians , Ambulatory Care , Humans , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/therapy , Pandemics , Perception , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Orthopedics ; 43(6): 351-355, 2020 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1067820

ABSTRACT

This study was performed to analyze the effect that coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) has had on orthopedic surgeons' practices, their patients, and orthopedic surgeons themselves through a survey distributed to members of the Louisiana Orthopaedic Association (LOA). An anonymous 22-question online survey was created and distributed to 323 LOA members. Of the 323 recipients of the survey, 99 (30.7%) responded. As a part of a multiple response set, in which respondents could choose more than one answer, the majority reported delayed care for routine orthopedic injuries (81 of 97, 83.5%). Almost every surgeon (n=95, 96.0%) reported stopping or delaying elective surgery because of COVID-19 and an increase in pain/disability/deformity in patients due to delay in elective procedures (73 of 97, 75.3%) and delay in seeking care (66 of 97, 68.0%). The majority reported an increased use of telehealth visits (68 of 97, 70.1%), a decrease in patient volume (88 of 97, 90.7%), and a reduction in income (79 of 98, 80.6%) during the past 6 months. A majority of surgeons (58 of 98, 59.2%) reported that they had applied for government assistance or took out loans. Via a multiple response set, respondents indicated that as a result of the pandemic, telehealth will become more widespread (64 of 98, 65.3%) and hospitals will exert a stronger influence over health care (64 of 98, 65.3%). The COVID-19 pandemic has had lasting effects on orthopedic surgeons in Louisiana and their practices, with a substantial decrease in the number of patients treated (90.5%), surgical volume, and revenue (80.6%). Orthopedic surgeons affected by the pandemic could use these data to further understand future challenges with patient care and changing orthopedic practice dynamics during this unique time. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(6):351-355.].


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Orthopedic Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Orthopedic Surgeons , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Elective Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Facilities and Services Utilization , Female , Health Care Surveys , Hospital Administration , Humans , Income , Louisiana/epidemiology , Male , Orthopedic Surgeons/economics , Pandemics , Remote Consultation , SARS-CoV-2
3.
JBJS Case Connect ; 10(3): e2000377, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-789018

ABSTRACT

CASE: A 58-year-old man presented with acute respiratory distress syndrome and coagulopathy secondary to COVID-19. He developed acute compartment syndrome (ACS) of the left hand. He underwent a bedside 10-compartment decompression of the hand with volar forearm and carpal tunnel release while in the ICU. This report adds to the scarce body of literature regarding orthopaedic complications related to COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Coagulopathy secondary to COVID-19 can be a risk factor for the development of ACS. Frequent examinations of lines, restraints, and extremities are recommended. The COVID-19 pandemic presents unique challenges, necessitating clinical adjustments to best care for patients.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Peripheral/adverse effects , Compartment Syndromes/etiology , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Hand/blood supply , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Compartment Syndromes/surgery , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/virology , SARS-CoV-2
4.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 28(11): 436-450, 2020 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-326604

ABSTRACT

The novel coronavirus pandemic, also known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has placed an immense strain on healthcare systems across the entire world. Consequently, multiple federal and state governments have placed restrictions on hospitals such as limiting "elective surgery" and recommending social or physical distancing. We review the literature on several areas that have been affected including surgical selection, inpatient care, and physician well-being. These areas affecting inpatient paradigms include surgical priority, physical or social distancing, file sharing for online clinical communications, and physician wellness. During this crisis, it is important that orthopaedic departments place an emphasis on personnel safety and slowing the spread of the virus so that the department can still maintain vital functions. Physical distancing and emerging technologies such as inpatient telemedicine and online file sharing applications can enable orthopaedic programs to still function while attempting to protect medical staff and patients from the novel coronavirus spread. This literature review sought to provide evidence-based guidance to orthopaedic departments during an unprecedented time. Orthopaedic surgeons should follow the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines, wear personal protective equipment (PPE) when appropriate, have teams created using physical distancing, understand the department's policy on elective surgery, and engage in routines which enhance physician wellness.


Subject(s)
Communicable Disease Control/organization & administration , Coronavirus Infections , Pandemics/prevention & control , Personal Protective Equipment/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral , Safety Management/organization & administration , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Elective Surgical Procedures/methods , Elective Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Male , Occupational Health , Orthopedic Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Orthopedic Procedures/trends , Patient Isolation/methods , Patient Safety , Patient Selection , Program Development , Program Evaluation , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL